INCONVENIENT TRUTH --- radical environmentalism

I am not a fan of Al Gore.  With that said, I suppose this has terribly offended environmentalist.  Now wait a minute, ok.  Let me explain why.  For me, I find it hard to believe in the radical agenda of environmentalism.  I simply have major concerns about their agenda and rhetoric which is politically charged.  I think their propaganda is filled with major errors and factual mistakes.  This especially includes Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”.  As I have read the essay by Stefan Lovgren in our English class, my common sense tells me there are serious claims of Gore that even me, logically thinking, cannot be true.

Here is the first claim that I find preposterous.  Global warming will also cause the introduction of new, invasive species.  This is contradictory even in itself with the belief that this planet is on a course of destruction because of humans, as Gore purports.  How can this claim be true?  Invasive species is so open ended.  Anything can fall into that category because this world is destined to fail.  There will be scientific discoveries of “new” species as time goes on.  Scientists are in the business to make discoveries upon their research.  There will be mutations of lower forms that create havoc upon humans.  Does that mean that global warming caused them?  I find that to be a wild claim.

Another claim is that sea levels will rise by 20 feet with the loss of shelf ice in Greenland and Antarctica.  Seriously can you envision 20 feet of rise in ocean waters?  It cannot even be calculated the enormous volume of water to raise the sea level by 20 feet.  The magnitude of that amount is so large that it is not possible to happen.  Sea level is the mean gradient to base elevations on.  If that would change even by a minute amount, the landscapes and horizons all around the globe would change too.  That means where there are coastal areas now, they would become flooded.  This would change the numbers in the equation to calculate the volume of water and make it even more astronomically large.  This is a complete false claim, and therefore, I reason that Gore is spreading false rumors and injecting fear into people’s minds that humans are evil beings.

Gore’s claim that the Arctic Ocean could be ice-free by summer of 2050.  He said that in 2006 and now evidence declares that there is absolutely no change yet in the conditions of the Arctic Ocean.  We are now 6 years closer to 2050 and if the ocean is to be ice-free by then the temperature of the whole world has to change almost 100 degrees higher.  If that would happen of course humans would be eradicated from the earth.  Our summer of 2012 was one of the hottest on record and yet nothing has changed in the Arctic.  I will even predict that this will be a very severe cold and wet winter.  Reversing any trends of global warming.

So, in conclusion, just stop and think of these claims.  Why does an environmentalist want to condemn the practices of us humans?  I say it all stems from the theory of evolution.  Darwinism is entrenched into radical minds to believe that humans come from lower life forms and they are ‘hell’ bent on destroying the planet.  The propagation of fear among us gives rise to believing a myth from only the higher intelligent beings.  The unintelligent humans must be controlled and forced to convert to radical environmentalism, either through government reforms or rhetorical dogma.  All books and scientific evidence contrary to their beliefs are to be destroyed.  So, whatever might happen in the future as to earth science and environmentalism, I will stand to the last end not believing false ideology.